《中国与世界 软实力的竞技（英文版）》收录相当对中国和国际传播研究有深入研究的国内外专家学者的论文，内容涉及国际传播的新理论研究成果和研究动态，中国在国际传播中的策略、中国同亚洲及周边国家的传播态势，以及目前国际传播现状的实际分析。
引言
导言
Part 1 理论视角
中国文化软实力在美国的现状：国际传播学视角
中国在非洲的软实力与国际传播
以性别为导向的传播治理中的网络和权力：理论与实践探索结合
Part 2 中国的国际传播
在澳大利亚话语中评估中国软实力策略的兼容性：澳大利亚关于中国环境形象的框架
践行软实力：21世纪初中国的自画像与他画像
孔子学院：软实力抑或宣传工具？——基于大洋洲孔子学院的框架分析
在参与性中国媒体项目中构建参与者之澳大利亚国家形象的个体认知框架
Part 3 教育软实力与公共外交
对数字时代澳大利亚通过中国留学生提升软实力的思考
跨国组织软实力的政治语境：传统美国海外教会大学与国家
通过教育践行软实力：印度和中国在南亚和东南亚的战略
中国和美国的高等教育排名：感知优势与潜力的测量
Part 4 文化产业与软实力
发展文化产业作为中国的软实力
日本流行文化：建构本世界形象中的软实力
Part 5 区域视角
软实力、公共关系和非主权国家的建设：加泰隆尼亚案例研究
软实力塑造空间与原住民话语、博物馆和吸引力
可持续发展和软实力：印度的案例研究
附录
《中国与世界 软实力的竞技（英文版）》：
More recently Haugaard and Ryan have mapped out the "development of the field" and highlighted multi-dimensionality in power theories by referring to the historical interweaving of different sources of power（ political authoritative， economic and ideological） as well as to the "language games" that have characterized conceptualizations about power.They identify three "meta-language games of power analysis"， according to which the rich literature can be organized：in the "conflictual language game"， which is closer to everyday speech， power constitutes and facilitates domination and "power over"； in the "consensual language game" power is seen as a capacity to act（it relates to expressions like "power to" and， sometimes， "power with" ） ； finally， there is a "constitutive" view of power which "sits both in tension with， and as the logical culmination of， the other two." In this case， in a Faucoultian sense， power is exercised when subjects' positions and identities are constituted， as a mix of "power over" and "power to".This reading allows to consider and distinguish between "agent-centred" perspectives（ focused on social practices， sources of autonomy and subjection） and "system-centred" perspectives（looking at structures and systems， collective actors in networks， global interdependence） .In the end， Haugaard and Ryan make explicit the challenge facing power theorists today： the difficulty of reconciling dualities， distinctions and diversity， since "all（ forms of power） are implicated in every aspect of social interaction." Thus， scholars are invited to develop an "ethnography of power" capable of exploring the interplay between agents and agency， short and long term perspectives， forms of power that reproduce and forms that challenge the order to things.
……
新书资讯
